All That Matters

Rechargeable batteries. In comparison to lithium-ion batteries these are an older but more cheaper technology generation, made from metal hydrates. Image by comedy_nose via flickr.

The title of this blog post is a bit tongue in cheek, but the situation isn’t that far from the truth when it comes to rechargeable batteries such as lithium-ion batteries. Ever since lithium-ion batteries were first commercialized in 1991 by Sony, based on work by John Goodenough and others, they have been highly successful in the market. Open your mobile phone and read the battery label, almost certainly it is a lithium battery. The lithium stores electrical charges in the battery’s anode. During discharge of the battery the lithium moves to the cathode, where the charge is released. Lithium-ion batteries are also used in electric cars, in laptops, for electric power tools and so on. The market is huge.

On the other hand, if you use these rechargeable batteries, their real-world problems are pretty clear. Storage capacity could be better, particularly for electrical cars. Then, these batteries should be rechargeable more often without degrading, and last but not least the charge cycle should be reasonably fast.

The success of lithium iron phosphate

The bottleneck in the storage capacity of lithium-ion batteries is how much lithium the electrodes can take up. In particular the cathodes are a problem, their capacity is smaller than that of the graphite anodes used. One of the best cathode materials, proposed by Goodenough early on, is lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO₄). Unfortunately, lithium iron phosphate as studied by Goodenough didn’t work well, it didn’t conduct electrical current! In 2002, Yet-Ming Chiang and colleagues from MIT then published a paper where they fabricated lithium iron phosphate that is made conducting through the addition of other metals. Furthermore, Chiang also discovered that if nanoparticles are used instead of bulk to make the cathode, the surface area of the electrodes is increased and hence their efficiency goes up.

[…]

Metamaterials are very exciting structures, one of the most exciting areas in photonics, I think. That’s because they allow an almost arbitrary modification of light (or acoustic) waves propagating through the material. Sadly, however, the highly promising potential of metamaterials gets often completely overblown by news reporting on fantastic effects. Cloaking devices are the prime example. Here I try to come up with a few points that might help to sort science from fiction.

Metamaterials are small metallic structures, typically rings or wires, that locally change the materials properties. These structures are much smaller than the wavelength of light. To a light wave, it is as if the structure is not made of tiny rings and wires, but looks like a homogeneous material. Hence their name ‘metamaterials’. Meta is Greek and means beyond. The first metamaterials all used the same small units of wires and rings, repeated over and over. With this, you can achieve a negative index of refraction, which enables superlenses – lenses with perfect resolution.

The original metamaterial designs consisted of electromagnetic resonators made of rings and wires. These devices are for THz and GHz radiofrequencies. Credit: NASA, via wikimedia

The next key advance was that metamaterials needn’t only consist of uniform assemblies of rings and wires. If you change the properties of each unit of a metamaterial, you can create a material that to light looks as if it changes its properties. This way it is possible to modify the propagation of light as it goes through the metamaterial. You can make it go round corners, turn it around. In theory, the possibilities are nearly endless, that much is clear.

The prime example to demonstrate the possibilities of metamaterials is the optical cloak. The term is borrowed from the science fiction series Star Trek. And naturally, it is these kind of visions that let our fantasy go wild when thinking about metamaterials cloaking. Images of Star Trek, or ‘Harry Potter cloaks’ and the ‘invisible man’ are often conjured when journalists, university press offices and even scientists try to explain metamaterials to the public. Sadly, in relation to what metamaterials can do, this is nonsense.

So here are a few things that metamaterials can and cannot do.

[…]

Photo by anttler via flickr

Designing organic molecules that perform repeated mechanical motions is not easy. The molecule needs to be robust on the one hand, and on the other hand have different stable states between which it can alternate. Achieving such complex functionality requires careful design considerations. Nature has solved this problem, and molecular motors perform important functions in living organisms, for example in enzymes.

The design and synthesis of artificial mechanical molecules performing specific functions remains a challenge. For example, molecular rotors have been fabricated before, but only showed limited functionality: their direction of rotation could not be reversed. […]