All That Matters

This week my colleagues at Nature Chemistry landed an impressive scoop, the publication of a paper by Michael Strano and colleagues from MIT on self-regenerating solar cells.

The performance of any kind of solar cell tends to degrade over time. This is particularly the case for organic solar cells, where sunlight can easily destroy the structure of the molecules used. Natural light-harvesting processes have a similar problem, for example during photosynthesis. The way plants solve this problem is through a self-repair mechanism.

Schematic of the regenerating solar cell consisting of light-absorbing proteins, lipid disks and carbon nanotubes. Reprinted by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd. Nature Chemistry, advance online publication (2010)

Taking cues from such self-regeneration strategies, Strano and colleagues use a concept that is surprisingly simple. They prepare a solution containing carbon nanotubes, bacterial light-harvesting proteins and discs made from lipid molecules — the structural components that form the membrane of cells. Once the surfactant that keeps all these molecules separate is removed the molecules assemble themselves: the proteins bind to the lipids, which then attach to the carbon nanotubes. No assembly required.

During solar cell operation sunlight is absorbed by the proteins and creates electronic charges that are transported along the carbon nanotubes to the electrical contacts of the solar cell. To regenerate the proteins damaged by the sunlight, surfactant is added again, along with a small quantity of new proteins to replace damaged molecules. This dissolves the structure. But once the surfactant is removed the molecules reassemble, fully repaired.

In the study, the solar cells ran on a 40 hour cycle: 32 hours of operation, followed by 8 hours regeneration. Despite so many hours of regeneration overall cell performance was up by a remarkable 300% in comparison to cells that are not regenerated. And this could be just the beginning. At the moment, as soon as the cells are turned on they lose about 60% efficiency within the first hour or so of operation. Delaying the onset of degradation or finding a more efficient way of regeneration should lead to further enhancements. But who knows, nature may have a solution to this problem, too.

Reference:
Ham, M., Choi, J., Boghossian, A., Jeng, E., Graff, R., Heller, D., Chang, A., Mattis, A., Bayburt, T., Grinkova, Y., Zeiger, A., Van Vliet, K., Hobbie, E., Sligar, S., Wraight, C., & Strano, M. (2010). Photoelectrochemical complexes for solar energy conversion that chemically and autonomously regenerate Nature Chemistry DOI: 10.1038/NCHEM.822

Photo by Scott Robinson (Clearly Ambiguous) via flickr.

Solar energy is a huge market and any improvement to the efficiency of solar cells has a significant impact. In 2008, worldwide photovoltaic solar energy production was about 5 gigawatts, and this is expected to rise to 15 gigawatts in 2015. To put this figure in context, a nuclear reactor produces around 1 to 1.5 gigawatts of electricity.

The overall conversion efficiency of the best solar cell devices, with complex designs that include multiple materials, reaches up to about 50%. For more common silicon-based solar cells efficiencies are around 20%, although commercial photovoltaic panels achieve even less than that. Any enhancement in solar cell efficiency, whether it is in terms of costs or in terms of efficiency, is therefore highly desirable and significant. If all photovoltaic cells that produce those 5 gigawatts of energy were only 5% more efficient, for example with 21% conversion efficiency instead of 20%, it would result in an increase in energy production equivalent to about 250 megawatts.

Another issue is cost. Bulk solar cells are better at catching more sunlight, but use more material and therefore cost a lot more than thin-film films. Albert Polman, Harry Atwater and colleagues have now developed a solar cell design that enhances the power efficiency of thin solar cells. In their study published in Optics Express they are able to enhance the efficiency of a 340 nanometer thick silicon solar cell by 27% when compared to a regular thin-film cell.

[…]

Last week I wrote about interesting physics that can be done with ultracold atoms. One of the experiments I described was related to the Hanbury Brown-Twiss effect. Although I mentioned the experiment in some detail, the focus of my post was more on the analogies between ultracold atom systems and other physical systems. I did only briefly mention the wider impact of the original Hanbury Brown-Twiss experiment on our understanding of the particle-wave duality of light.

The Hanbury Brown and Twiss experimental apparatus from their 1956 Nature paper. (c) 1956 Nature Publishing Group.

As Chad Orzel mentioned in detail, a version of the experiments by Robert Hanbury Brown and Richard Twiss is a key contribution to the debate on the nature of light and represents an unambiguous proof that photons do exist.

He has now written more on how the experiment on atom lasers that I wrote about fits into this context. The description of Hanbury Brown and Twiss effects in ultracold atom systems is very lucid and provides a wonderful introduction to the experiments not only on ultracold atoms but also on photons.

The Hanbury Brown and Twiss experiment is one of the milestones in physics, and influenced the work by Roy Glauber on the quantum theory of optical coherence that got him half of the 2005 Nobel Prize in Physics.

Reference:
BROWN, R., & TWISS, R. (1956). Correlation between Photons in two Coherent Beams of Light Nature, 177 (4497), 27-29 DOI: 10.1038/177027a0